Mensan Ain't So Smart

Well, they ain't

I was sufficiently provoked into posting the following on the Facebook Mensa International page where it was - so predicted, as evinced in the text - suppressed. No matter. It gave me a chance to consolidate some addled thoughts and avail me a template from which to explicate further in the future. Assuming we have any.

“Chris gets his wish” adept.:

Obligatory Disclaimer

Some of what follows has been recycled from my previous writings. However, as Zig Ziglar noted, repetition is the mother of learning, the father of action, and the architect of accomplishment. This repetition becomes necessary when dealing with the willfully ignorant, the inexplicably arrogant, and the existentially vulnerable.

Given the prevalence of people who mindlessly replicate whatever is imprinted upon them, it is crucial to foster critical thinking as a counterweight to institutionalized ignorance.

Not that we weren’t warned of an erosion of scientific standards and an ensuing suppression of informed dissent.

Barzun and Whitehead cautioned against dilutions of the academic canon just as Eisenhower warned about the military-industrialization complex - eventualities which have since contributed to the current state of affairs.

That lowering of standards, abandonment of scientific rigors, and silencing of critical voices has long since come to pass so that we now live in a fractured society increasingly at the mercy of our chemical, biological, and ballistic war machines. Big Pharma’s power has gotten to where it can simultaneously telegraph its every punch (“There WILL be a pandemic”), fast-track bioweapons and Trojan Horse them as vaccines, and suppress effective therapeutics. To further insure its success (the surviving injured can sue, after all), it has a de facto license to kill in encouraging harmful protocols (ventilators, remdesivir), and silencing dissent by discrediting and de-platforming would-be whistleblowers within the medical profession.

And yet…

…despite all manner of enabling agencies like interminable two week lockdowns and late-night TV dancing syringes, some truths have become self-evident. And in the aftermath of allegedly “fast and furious” development and deployment of a product that was shelf-ready by its creators’ standards, it became clear that the vaxx did nothing it was supposed to do and much what it wasn’t (at least by users’ hopes and expectations). Suddenly, high profile figures such as Steve Kirsch, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Aseem Malhotra made a sharp pivot. Having supposedly taken all the initial shots, these men later called for the mRNA vaccines to be stopped. Those that ramrodded the proceedings- Robert Redfield, Anthony Fauci, and Francis Collins - now say that the response to Covid was wrong, with the former director of the CDC even admitting that vaccines should NEVER have been mandated.

What accounts for this dramatic turnaround?

Was it simply a matter of recognizing the martinet unreasonableness of extorting compliance on something of such low lethality?

No. It was a growing recognition of the varying degrees of toxicity associated with the vaxx, despite all manner of CDC, WHO, and NIH interference in trying to legitimize the poison, suppress data, and discredit its critics.

Differences in “side effects” - in quotes as they are referred to as such, and not as “actually intended goals” - were affected by factors such as brand technology, storage conditions, and the number of doses administered (any amnesties being owed to the grace of God and placebos), but were unilaterally recognized. Survivors and impacted families began staging mass protests in Australia, Japan, Scotland, and elsewhere.

What is now generally recognized is that the “vaccine” subverts immune, cardiovascular, and neurological systems and disables T cells that fight cancer, causing remission cases to resurface and metastasis to over-rev (TURBO like). Moreover, previously dormant latent infections can re-emerge once the immune system has been compromised.

Whether or not this was an intended outcome is for tribunals to decide, but in any event accounts for unprecedented rates of myocarditis, pericarditis, clotting anomalies, miscarriages, deaths incident to contaminated blood transfusions, and strokes and cardiac events among youths. It doubtlessly factors in other escalating health issues, such as declining fertility rates, skin disorders, vision problems, etc.

Virtually every country that has rolled out the vaxx has experienced higher death rates, the percentages of which rise with the aggressiveness of vaccination rates (23 percent excess death rates…check out the Eurostat webpage).

However, these excessive death statistics have been largely suppressed in the globalist media, taking a backseat to other scripted dramas playing out on the world stage. When they are acknowledged, they are variously attributed to “happy heart syndrome,” hard exercise, sporting event excitation, and other long-established human activities that have not previously proven terminal - including Covid!

In Wales, it’s an increase in electricity bills that’s the culprit. In the UK, it’s heavy metal and techno music that gets blamed. In Brazil, global warming is a person of interest. Rashes of spine and brain injuries are explained away by “population densities” (two birds, one rubric).

Others cited for humanity’s creeping decrepitude include excessive defecation, being single, and, alternatively, the heat and the cold.

That rise of unexpected deaths -  including incidences of people dying suddenly - over the past three years should prompt an occasional “well, what changed in our reality to cause that?” introspection. But no, there’s relatively little interest - let alone inquiry- on the part of our governments, news media, or medical professionals. Or even Mensans.

That the aforementioned BS explanations appear in once credible medical journals like The Lancet underscore the degree to which these publications have sold out to chemical companies. That doctors who orchestrated the plandemic now speak out against the mechanisms they put in place may be an attempt to avoid prosecution should a desperately needed Nuremberg II get underway (Malone seeks paternity of the technology even as he denies child support).

From the outset there were red flags: the manipulation of nanoviruses since 1965, the sociopathic histories of the players involved, the rhetoric postulating a forthcoming outbreak (echoed now with bird flu), and the lack of a single success in developing any prophylactic against any nanovirus, including the common cold.

In the aftermath of all that has accrued incident to lockdowns, masks, and jabs, there has been no shortage of investigative scientists and journalists trying to expose Big Pharma’s travesties, including those predating Covid. But one has to seek them out—sooner rather than later, as they are often silenced one way or another.

Consider the case of Jane Burgermeister, a German scientist who warned about the potential dangers of bird flu shots containing squalene, which she claimed could cause a cytokine storm. She suffered severe repercussions, including imprisonment and eventual death. Consider 2021 when physicians with degrees from Stanford, Michigan, and Yale were banned from social media for discussing what would happen. People might want to revisit those videos. At the very least, look at those documentaries wherein morticians and pathologists discuss calamari-like structures being removed from the veins and arteries of corpses (fwiw, Rumble is infinitely better than YouRube in availing tutorials).

Elsewhere, subscriptions to various substacks can be helpful.

Mark Crispin Miller keeps an almost daily track of anomalous deaths. Ana Maria Mihalcea studies what is happening to our blood at the cellular level in the run-up to singularity. Stegiel’s July 20th offering is timely and pertinent, as is 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s July 9 column. Dr. Naomi Wolf leaves no doubt where she stands on whether the vaxx is a bioweapon. Unacceptable Jessica spells out the implications of Pfizer and Moderna disclosing to NACI their products’ adverse effects, paralleling Canada’s violent crime rate. Conspiracy Sarah lives up to her name, and her March 24, 2024 piece takes the CDC to task for its suppression of cancer death data after 2020 even as it acknowledges skyrocketing cancers (make a point to look up Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a UK oncologist examining the surge in cancer cases and how they relate to the jab).

Each of these writers offer STATISTICS and additional links relating to vaxx-incurred deaths and injuries. Yes, we are talking the diminution and destruction of fucking human beings.

The thing is, and I have to spell this out to self-centered Chris who is both too lazy to do his own research and too apathetic of his fellow man to care - I can’t include links because they are invariably censored as being in violation of some amorphous community standard (the Borg collective’s). Example: one website that has the words “How bad…” and is later followed by “…is your batch” - figure it out, Mensans - was so censored.

Those who refuse to investigate further what has been summarized for them—including Chris Surmeier and Celeste Vasas Rogers—end up arrogantly and ignorantly regurgitating the globalists’ Kool-Aid, and revealing themselves as greater threats to humanity than a misanthrope such as I. In Rogers’ case, she has blocked me, which while most agreeable to me, deprives her of the opportunity to possibly profit from something other than affirmative action and DEI practices.

I consciously refrain from discussing the nanoparticle component of the equation, as well as the absence of scientific vetting, informed decisions, the initial suppression of vaxx ingredients, upticks in insurance rates, why Pfizer wanted - and got - a 75-year amnesty on releasing its info, etc., as each is worthy of separate exploration and I was specifically challenged on whether or not there were correlations between the alleged cure and the injured and dead (the thread of which has now been deleted…more in-house censorship?).

One wouldn’t think that there’d be so universal a need to effectively challenge mainstream narratives, but here we are. Obviously, access to credible and reliable sources of information is essential; certainly more so than the idiotic dismissiveness readily available 24/7. Alas, our educational system encourages belief rather than thought and thereby promotes delightfully uncomplicated mindsets out into the world to propagate more of the same. Hence, the population of gatekeepers diminishes alongside that of vetted intellectuals. Easy to accomplish in a world where genders are confused and hyperventilating passes for debate.

Those entities that remain coalesce into Borg collectives, serving as a draft pool for the banality of evil. Any deviation from script is a threat to the group and subject to retaliation by those determined to bend non-conformists to their will.

The thing is, I don’t bend. Nor should I. That 999 idiots sign off on some BS hardly validates it. The one holdout—recognizing stupidity for what it is and abstaining from it—is the one I side with. It only becomes problematic when large numbers begin believing their BS. When the cultural canons become so adulterated as to lose all credibility.

Still, this screed is written in full anticipation of the usual “yadda-yadda-yadda” emoji-dependent derision by those in no position to refute it. Indeed, I have every expectation that this post will be censored, shadow-banned, or otherwise subject to some manner of algorithmic purgatory.

Meanwhile, arguments chastising me for not being an epidemiologist or virologist on Covid and vaxx concerns miss the goddamn point.

One needn’t know how to develop film to see how it has been weaponized. (Although the surrealities of the past few years have made fledgling immunologists of us all.)

My ever-reliable critics say I am talking out my lower orifice. That in acting on visceral intuitions and later finding justification in abstaining from the injections I was gambling with my health and that of others. I say they continually use the wrong metrics to evaluate their surroundings, neglecting to study the histories of these 21st-century Mengele’s (Fauci was killing gays in the eighties) and failing to conduct critical analysis of their current actions (I have kindly provided a starter kit herein). Certainly, my skepticism is more benign than the credulity of those granting Fauci and company an immunity evasive of the vaccinated (indeed, the vaxx actually enhances the likelihood of infection).

Plainly, they ignored the red flags evident from the beginning and continue to do so, now doubling down on blind hope that the narratives they've supported will not come back to bite them and their loved ones on their asses. Cognitive dissonance may have already set in, with many reluctant the face the guilt of their misplaced trust.

How better to question and critically analyze the information provided by those in positions of authority instead of meekly accepting people suddenly falling over dead being characterized as adult SIDS and taking me to task for doing my homework.

But then, my foes should familiarize themselves with the motives driving these scientific and cultural adulterations and the histories of the principals involved.

I would hope that Surmeier might start with RFK Jr’s book on Fauci. Perhaps join the Died Suddenly Worldwide page on Facebook. He should expose himself to things other than what the globalists mainline him as these influence whatever future he has. Ffs, he should simply Google “excess death” or “excess mortality” rates if he wants numbers.

It might be too late for folks like me to do anything other than have fun with idiots, but at least I have migrated to the right side of the “greater than” sign.

But then I never yell louder than when my audience is deaf.